More People Need A Punch To the Head

It is often complained about that civil society just isn’t very civil anymore. And those who argue certainly have a very good point. A cursory glance around the world at the moment would show a smattering of politically based riots and terrorism going on at any given time. Much more prevalent (albeit not as singularly harmful) are the many tiny, venal ways that people make other people’s lives worse.

Undoubtedly, you’ve seen these in your daily life: Those in the workforce have to deal with the inane regulations of their bosses (that seemingly exist just to prove you can follow orders) and the absurd demands of customers, students of all ages have to deal with their smarmy classmates, and the worst thing of all is that in many cases (particularly in schools), both parties will get punished equally in some hamhanded attempt to be equal, rather than judging who the more guilty party was.

It’s all so frustrating, which is why, as something of a former juvenile delinquent and public school disciplinary case, I would like to make a suggestion based on what was my favorite method of conflict resolution as a teenager:

The world would be an infinitely better place, national stress levels would be (purely conjecturing) a tenth of what it is now, and American civility and manners would skyrocket, if people had to live with the fear of getting a punch to the head if they rub people the wrong way. No weapons, no excessive beating and violence, just that every law abiding person be allowed ONE (1) clean punch to the head of an obnoxious, uncivil excuse for a human being a day.

Atavistic? Perhaps, but in the words of the vastly underrated Robert Howard, Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing”. And as someone who acknowledged the faults of modern America (modern being the 1920s for him) while still ultimately loving his country, I feel Mr. Howard would agree even more with this notion if he saw the USA in its present form.

Idly thinking about the many unpleasant personalities and societal traits that run rampant in the United States today, there are very few I can think of that wouldn’t be served with just one good smack to the face:

Would the national embarrassment that is Black Friday be nearly as bad, or even existent at all, if the bellowing biped buffalo had to be afraid of retribution from the poorly paid retail drones that they bully and abuse to get their overpriced gewgaws?

Would bosses be able to outsource at a moment’s notice, force their employees to work far beyond the legally mandated 40 hours a week, and demand that inane regulations that don’t affect productivity or customer service be followed if you could punch them for their idiocy?

(Such a thing goes double for the Human Resources schoolmarms [male and female] that hold far too much power in modern America.)

Would school bullying and the omnipresent school shootings be nearly as big a problem as they are if the bullied kids were allowed to fight back against their oppressors instead of being punished with inane zero-tolerance policies?

Would the incessant demands and whinings of collegiate children exist at all if they had reason to fear a bit of pain…or any retribution at all?

The answer to all these, I think is, “no”. And really, the greater cause of why America sucks as hard as it does nowadays is a lack of connection to consequences—a lack of “skin in the game“, if you will. Having to invest time and effort to NOT get punched in the head will do much to increase investment in the “social contract”.

Sadly, with the USA still being as litigious as it is, the best we can hope for is for articles like this to shift the Overton window.

  • Consolation_of_Philosophy

    I’ll go a step further – I have long felt that the encumbrance of laws, both criminal and civil, that prevent the swift settling of minor disputes via (brief) fisticuffs make us *less* civilized, rather than more civilized.

    We live in an age where two gentlemen simply cannot take their disagreements outside. And if they do, the victor in such a scenario faces arrest, possible imprisonment, lawsuit, loss of employment, etc.

    This is the pure opposite of civilization. Because the cost of engaging in any violence is so high, people restrain themselves to the point that if/when we do engage in violence, it is of the extreme variety. After all, the cost of engaging in a minor fistfight is astronomically high; The cost of engaging in a lasting and genuinely harmful act of violence is (rightly) astronomically high. So, when people snap and get physical, they are incentivized to go big, because they have to pay a big cost regardless.

    • I agree.

      There are a few states/municipalities that have “mutual combat laws”, where two guys can decide that they want to fistfight to settle a dispute and have no charges pressed afterward.

      If those were made a nation-wide law, I think that would fix a few things.